Trust Centre

EU AI Act readiness for recruitment AI governance

Recruitment and candidate-evaluation AI may fall within a high-risk category under the EU AI Act, depending on the system and its use. Areeva’s approach focuses on readiness and supporting customer governance.

Configured workflowAREEVA / ACTIVE
Working contextEU AI Act readiness for recruitment AI governanceDefined criteria · Evidence linked
01

Risk-management readiness

02

Data governance

03

Documentation and logging

Human checkpointEvidence ready for review

Operating idea

Readiness is an ongoing discipline of intended use, documentation, human oversight and monitoring. It is not a certification, a guarantee of compliance and not legal advice.

What it supports

A clearer way to organise the work.

Capabilities remain visible, reviewable and connected to the operating context around them.

01

Risk-management readiness

Support discussion of documented intended use and risk-management considerations.

02

Data governance

Address data governance and quality-control expectations in the context of customer requirements.

03

Documentation and logging

Plan for technical documentation and activity logging as important readiness themes.

04

Transparency and human oversight

Support transparency for deployers and affected candidates, with effective human oversight of consequential decisions.

05

Robustness and monitoring

Address accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity, post-market monitoring and incident-process expectations as part of readiness planning.

Control principles

Designed around accountable review.

Areeva’s EU AI Act readiness framework supports customer governance and alignment work; it is not a certification.

Effective human oversight is essential for consequential recruitment decisions.

Areeva does not provide legal advice; customers should seek appropriate legal guidance for their own obligations.

Customers should assess prohibited-practice and transparency obligations for their own intended use.

Readiness framework

Eight areas for a serious governance conversation.

This framework describes preparation themes, not a compliance determination. Customers should obtain legal advice about their own role and obligations.

01

Risk management

Document intended use, foreseeable risks and the controls expected across the system lifecycle.

02

Data governance

Address relevance, quality, provenance and governance expectations for data used in recruitment workflows.

03

Technical documentation

Maintain system information that helps providers, deployers and reviewers understand design and use.

04

Activity logging

Support traceability with records appropriate to the workflow, oversight model and applicable obligations.

05

Transparency

Give deployers and affected candidates information that supports informed use and appropriate challenge.

06

Human oversight

Ensure people can understand outputs, recognise limitations, intervene and own consequential decisions.

07

Robustness and security

Treat accuracy, resilience and cybersecurity as ongoing system requirements rather than one-time claims.

08

Post-market monitoring

Plan monitoring, feedback, incident handling and corrective action across real-world operation.

See Areeva in your workflow

See this in the context of your workflow.

Bring your stages, decision points and operating requirements. We’ll shape the walkthrough around the work your team actually does.